Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): El-Ihsan: Journal of Contemporary Islamic Education
Articles

Ibn Khaldun`s Mixed Learning Concepts Shaping Learning Outcomes and New Concepts of Observational Learning: (Study in Haji Ya’qub Islamic Boarding School Lirboyo Kediri)

Muhammad Farid Asysyauqi
Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo
Ali Riyadi
Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri
Moh. Irmawan Jauhari
Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri

Published 2025-12-28

Keywords

  • Ibn Khaldun,
  • Mixed Learning,
  • Observational Learning,
  • Learning Outcomes,
  • Islamic Boarding School,
  • Islamic Education
  • ...More
    Less

Abstract

Ibn Khaldun as a Muslim-Philosopher devetod a lot of learning theories including Behaviorist-Cognitve Social ideas integrally. The dimension of ‘aql tajrībī will be more competent with wāzi’ or the equivalent meaning whose dimension is S-R contingency so that it becomes tajribah-ṣaḥīḥah. At the Haji Ya’qub Islamic Boarding School (PPHY) Lirboyo represents the prototype of the mixed concept which is the reason for this research wan to explore the implementation dan learning outcomes of the mixed concept in PPHY. This qualitative instrumental single case study seeks to explore this with a mature concept and field data obtaainde by observation, interviews and documentation so that the analysis of the OMA system becomes the end of the export tool and even new findings are displayed. This study shows that habituation of the affective basis of the dominan commitment level is formed with stimulus tikrār accompanied by a comparable response. On Average, Informaants experience 3 tikrār both in punistment, instruction of pondok activities such as istigastah, compulsory learning, compulsory lesrning , and skill maturity stage. The ikrāh aspect of the pondok as wāzi’ creates a hierarchical flow of observational learning and skills in contrast to the concept of Bandura where the motiviasional aspect becomes a hierarchical stratification preceding the retention stage

References

  1. Anderson, Lorin W., David R. Krathwohl, et.al, eds. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Abriged. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc, 2001.
  2. Asysyauqi, M. F., and Zaenal Arifin. “Relevansi Konsep Belajar Ibnu Khaldun Dalam Perspektif Teori Belajar Kontemporer.” Intelektual: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Keislaman Vol. 13, no. No. 1 (2023): 851–08. https://doi.org/10.33367/ji.v13i1.3645.
  3. Burhanudin, Akbar Ilham, Muhammad Purwanto, and Hajar Dewantoro. “Learning Method of Ibnu Khaldun.” The 3rd International Conference on Advance & Scientific Innovation (ICASI) Vol. 22 (2020): 69–85. https://doi.org/DOI%252010.18502/kss.v7i10.11346.
  4. Capkuy, Ahmet. “İbn Haldun Düşüncesinde Yöntem ve Bunun İslam Felsefesi Açısından Anlamı.” Rumeli Journal of Islamic Studies (online) 3, no. 6 (2020). https://doi.org/14.10.2020.
  5. Dhofier, Zamakhsyari. Tradisi Pesantren. Cet-19. Jakarta: LP3ES, 2019.
  6. Hergenhahn, B.R., and Matthew H. Olson. Teori Belajar. Ed. 7. cet-6. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2015.
  7. Ibn Khaldūn, ‘Abd al-Rahmān. Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldūn. Cet-1. 2 vols. Damaskus: Dār al-Balkhi, 2004.
  8. Krathwohl, David R., Benjamin S. Bloom, and Betram B. Masia. Taxonomy of Educational Objective: Book 2 Afective Domain. New York, Amerika Serikat: Longman, 1964.
  9. Lowes, Ricky. “Knowing You: Personal Tutoring, Learning Analytics and the Johari Window.” Frontiers in Education 5, no. 101 (July 2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.0010.
  10. Muthohar, Ahmad. Ideologi Pendidikan Pesantren. Semarang: Pustaka Rizki Putra, 2007.
  11. Pasiska, Pasiska. “Epistemologi Metode Pendidikan Islam Ibnu Khaldun.” EL-Ghiroh 17, no. 02 (October 2019): 02. https://doi.org/10.37092/el-ghiroh.v17i02.104.
  12. Salkin, Neil J. Encyclopedia of Educational Psychology. Vols. 1 & 2. Amerika Serikat: SAGE Publication Inc, 2008.
  13. Schunk, Dale H. Learning Theories An Education Perspective. Sixth. Amerika Serikat: Pearson Education, Inc., 2012.
  14. ———. Teori-Teori Pembelajaran: Sebuah Perspektif Pendidikan. 6th ed. Translated by Tri wibowo B.S. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.
  15. Simpson, Elizabeth Jane. The Classificattion of Educational Objective: Psychomotor Domain. Urbana, Illinois: Universitas of Illinois, 1966.
  16. Subagyo, Agus, and Indra Kristian. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Garut: CV. Aksara Global Akademia, 2023.
  17. Tim P. S. I PPHY. Resolusi Hasil Sidang Istimewa 2023-2024 M/ 1445-1446 H Pondok Pesantren Haji Ya’qub. Lirboyo: Pondok Pesantren Haji Ya’qub, 2024.
  18. Winkel, W.S. Psikologi Pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Media Abadi, 2012.